Tag Archives: GNU

Why do we tolerate this?

When I built a computer from parts purchased online I didn’t think too much about the packaging with the motherboard stating Windows version blah blah blah would be required. I know better. I installed Fedora from the Live CD and never looked back. My primary, home-built, computer has never smelled the stench of Windows, and it is honestly the best computer I’ve ever had the pleasure of using.

But today I purchased a keyboard to replace the one I had with my Dell XPS 420 for the past half decade (don’t eat/drink and type, duh) and I’m looking at the box and the damn thing actually states as a system requirement Windows version blah blah blah.

20130809-201450.jpg

Just to make sure I wasn’t missing something, I plugged it into my (sadly discontinued) 24 inch iMac. It works fine. Had to press all of two buttons and one click on the keyboard recognition dialogue, which ran upon booting with the new keyboard attached, and it was recognized and functioning perfectly (as long as I remember the Windows/super key is the Command key). No windows installed there. Then I plugged it into the Dell machine – which hasn’t had any windows installed since I wiped the drives clean with Parted Magic and began using the machine as an OS experimental machine. Currently running Linux Mint 15 and ArtistX (Ubuntu with tons of creation applications pre-installed if you haven’t heard of it before), the keyboard is somehow managing just fine despite the absence of the aforementioned pre-requisite systems…And I didn’t have to do a damn thing to get it set up. Just booted and started typing.

So next I looked at the manufacturer of the keyboard – which is not (at least not explicitly stated to be) Microsoft (which would at least make it understandable, if still wrong, to say a Microsoft owned operating system is required to use the product). It’s a Dynex keyboard, and according to Wikipedia (I can actually say that with a straight face, unlike some years ago when it was a laughing stock of mis-information) Dynex is a Best Buy house brand, which is consistent with the fact I purchased the keyboard at Best Buy.

So the real question is: Why would Best Buy (Dynex) include a verifiably false statement about their products on the packaging of said products? I doubt very much they would of their own accord… Which leads me to believe somewhere in the depths of hell there is some agreement, probably greased along by the universal lubricant of shady dealings, between Microsoft and Best Buy (and damn near every other supplier of hardware in the universe), the terms of which require these suppliers to lie to customers about their products’ so called requirements.

This is of course nothing new – in fact this story is so old it’s almost not worth rehashing… Except for the fact it is still happening! Why on earth do these companies still show such deference to Microsoft? Would the survival of these companies really be in jeopardy if they were to call off such arrangements with Microsoft and say “No. We’re not going to be including that ridiculously false statement on our products, which are compatible with nearly (if not) all operating systems.”? Maybe their survival is at stake; I don’t know. It must be for them to continue to behave so otherwise irrationally.

It’s a fucking crime what Microsoft gets away with.